Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E26A9FBBA1
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 May 2007 21:25:01 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 74492-02 for
	<pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 May 2007 21:24:46 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FD49FBA34
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 May 2007 21:24:57 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l4F0Or6u001682;
	Mon, 14 May 2007 20:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Rob Tester" <robtester@gmail.com>
cc: "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Trouble returning a text field from an SRF 
In-reply-to: <07ed01c7966e$308ffc20$91aff460$@com> 
References: <f5f60fb50705120826q7e08c426offc9268bb776e8b6@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070513181154.GB11750@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<07ec01c79669$25dad7a0$719086e0$@com>
	<29473.1179176436@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<07ed01c7966e$308ffc20$91aff460$@com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Rob Tester" <robtester@gmail.com>
	message dated "Mon, 14 May 2007 14:23:41 -0700"
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:24:53 -0400
Message-ID: <1681.1179188693@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200705/28
X-Sequence-Number: 6535

"Rob Tester" <robtester@gmail.com> writes:
> I have tried this using pgadmin3 (v1.6.1) and npgsql with the same results,
> no data returned in the text field when the data goes over 65535 chars.
> Maybe both clients are incorrectly setting a limit on a text field?

What happens when you try it in plain old psql?

			regards, tom lane