Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA42610;
	Wed, 10 May 2000 09:52:50 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA17831;
	Wed, 10 May 2000 09:52:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: ECPG failed and Postmaster getting bigger in using perl Pg 
In-reply-to: <20000510094222.A2799@fam-meskes.de> 
References: <20000510022157.4467.qmail@web213.mail.yahoo.com>
	<3918FE241C2.6546SAKAIDA@smtp.psn.ne.jp>
	<20000510094222.A2799@fam-meskes.de>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
	message dated "Wed, 10 May 2000 09:42:22 +0200"
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:52:48 -0400
Message-ID: <17828.957966768@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200005/86

Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> ARGH!
> This has been in before. I have no idea where it got lost. To make matters
> worse this has not made it into the archive before 7.0 was released right?

Nope, not if it wasn't in CVS on Monday evening :-(.  Oh well, there's
most certainly going to be a 7.0.1 ...

			regards, tom lane