DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=DiqORRMUF6VcZ4AhWt7wyEYmuCvNXD10Xt+EjzDBYJEnCcROyrgpAcvR3L5vKysTJp
	DPpcDuknAMHgx5uoM9JGmLJL5J9HC+RwJHENdlpGsxoC9Sbos3cv69I58K5BkvLs//lk
	a9TDU9BOABQJHmAWsfDTmD1x9/df1l6iNHURU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090325215034.GA3137@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <200807081502.58572.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<20090325215034.GA3137@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:47:48 +0000
Message-ID: <18071eea0903251747x650baa68hd7800958be301985@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired
From: Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2009/3/25 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Some PostgreSQL mailing lists, including the one you are reading now, ar=
e
>> proposed to be retired, because they receive very little or mostly off-t=
opic
>> traffic.
>
>> * pgsql-interfaces
>>
>> Many PostgreSQL interfaces have their own mailing lists. =A0Posts that d=
on't fit
>> anywhere else could go to pgsql-general.
>
> We consider that enough time for objections has passed with no
> objections being raised, so this list is going to be deleted Real Soon
> Now. =A0You Have Been Warned.

I find it amusing that "low traffic" implies some level of
irrelevancy.  What a load of tosh.  This list has a purpose, it
*serves* that purpose, and does so well.  By removing this and
consolidating it with another similarly-related one, you're just going
to contaminate that other list.

-- Thomas Adam