Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f19FGbx37396 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:16:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f19FBk918228; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:11:46 -0500 (EST) To: Jan Wieck cc: Hannu Krosing , "D. Johnson" , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: Postgres and Oracle differences and questions In-reply-to: <200102082156.QAA11064@jupiter.greatbridge.com> References: <200102082156.QAA11064@jupiter.greatbridge.com> Comments: In-reply-to Jan Wieck message dated "Thu, 08 Feb 2001 16:56:04 -0500" Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 10:11:46 -0500 Message-ID: <18225.981731506@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200102/74 X-Sequence-Number: 1027 Jan Wieck writes: > Uh - you're right. I wouldn't want to change it now, but ASAP > in the 7.2 cycle. That seems overly conservative. It's a one-line, easily tested change... regards, tom lane