Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [198.7.0.32]) by hub.org
	(8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id VAA28222 for
	<pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>;
	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 21:50:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elf (dfoster.dialup.access.net [166.84.254.216])
	by mail1.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixM1.3) with SMTP id VAA26122
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>;
	Fri, 20 Mar 1998 21:49:52 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199803210249.VAA26122@mail1.panix.com>
X-Sender: dfoster@popserver.panix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 21:57:58 -0500
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
From: David Foster <dfoster@panix.com>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Latest postodbc?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.980319120117.19573C-100000@hub.org>
References: <199803191622.LAA25805@mail2.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 12:03 PM 3/19/98 , The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, David Foster wrote:
>
>> Where is the latest version of PostODBC.  Is it posrc31.zip, dated Feb. 12?
>> 
<snip>
>	The latest version is included with v6.3, and isn't backwards
>compatible with pre-v6.3 servers (our fault, we changed the internal
>communications protocols)...

OK, I grabbed the postgres 6.3 release, as well as the stuff from the CVSup
tree.

Has anyone been able to compile this?  The line breaks seem to have gone
screwy, 
causing lots of the single-line comments to fall over to multiple lines.
Not good.

First, I thought it was my editor, but I double checked in in a hexdump
from a freshly
untarred postgres distribution.  Is there an easy fix to this, or something
I should be 
doing?