Received: from mustang.sdc.com.au ([203.2.199.1]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id VAA13083 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 21:12:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mustang.sdc.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mustang.sdc.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA11003; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 10:40:31 +0930 Message-Id: <199804180110.KAA11003@mustang.sdc.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo , pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver In-reply-to: Your message of "17 Apr 1998 20:38:02 +0200." <86yax4cn05.fsf@barsoom.Hamartun.Priv.NO> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 10:40:30 +0930 From: Stephen Davies > Stephen Davies writes: > > > I do not know what the internal representation is but they are > > displayed by psql as either dd-mm-yyyy or mm-dd-yyyy depending on > > whether the server has -o -e or not. As in most parts of the world, > > Australia uses dd-mm-yyyy as a standard. > > Well, no. I have no idea which is more common of the two you mention, > but the majority of the people of this world actually use the ISO 8601 > standard representation: yyyy-mm-dd. > OK. Point taken. However, the point that I was trying to make is that, to my knowledge, nobody outside the US uses mm/dd. Cheers, Stephen. ======================================================================== Stephen Davies Consulting scldad@sdc.com.au Adelaide, South Australia. Voice: 61-8-82728863 Computing & Network solutions. Fax: 61-8-82741015