Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id KAA05996; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 10:52:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA04975; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 10:51:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199804271451.KAA04975@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size To: byronn@insightdist.com (Byron Nikolaidis) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 10:51:28 -0400 (EDT) Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org In-Reply-To: <3544961A.26395F19@insightdist.com> from "Byron Nikolaidis" at Apr 27, 98 10:28:42 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > >>>> Other front-end libraries reading this protocol will have to change > > >>>> to accept this field. > > > > And the end-of-query indicator. I think now is the time to do it if > > we're gonna do it. Right now, it seems most code is using libpq rather > > than seeing the protocol directly, so fixing these problems should be > > pretty painless. But wasn't there some discussion recently of running > > the protocol directly from Tcl code? If that gets popular it will > > become much harder to change the protocol. > > > > Hello, > > Please remember that the ODBC driver handles the protocol directly, (it does > not use libpq). I would assume that if you guys make protocol changes you > will post a summary of them on the interfaces list? Absolutely. Guaranteed. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)