Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 08:47:43 +0100
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>
To: pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Message-ID: <19981118084743.A869@usa.net>
Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-hackers@hub.org
References: <19981117101824.C2181@usa.net>
	<Pine.LNX.3.96.981117183349.3444G-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981117183349.3444G-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk>;
	from Peter T Mount on Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 06:40:01PM +0000

On Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 06:40:01PM +0000, Peter T Mount wrote:
> it has each required parameter represented by a ?
> 
> insert into mytable (field1,field2,field3) values (?,?,?);
> 
> Now the current postgresql jdbc implementation stores this string, and has
> a Vector (Java for a dynamic array) that has each value stored in it as
> the client application sets them. When the client calls the
> executeUpdate() or executeQuery() methods, we just replace the ?'s with
> the values in sequence, and pass the query to the backend as normal.

That's exactly what I wanted to use for ecpg. But I guess I postpone it just
a little more. :-)

Michael
-- 
Dr. Michael Meskes, Manager of the Western Branch Office, Datenrevision GmbH
work: Cuxhavener Str. 36, D-21149 Hamburg
home: Th.-Heuss-Str. 61,  D-41812 Erkelenz, Michael.Meskes@usa.net
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux!