Received: from pc63.rp-plus.de (meskes@ppp06725.01019freenet.de [212.81.154.69]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA50421 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 07:45:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Michael.Meskes@gmx.net) Received: (from meskes@localhost) by pc63.rp-plus.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id NAA00473; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:49:24 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:49:24 +0200 From: Michael Meskes To: Dave Broudy Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ecpg cursors and scope Message-ID: <19990421134924.A343@gmx.net> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Broudy , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Dave Broudy on Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 09:46:14PM -0400 On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 09:46:14PM -0400, Dave Broudy wrote: > I have two senarios about scoping and ecpg's parsing of cursor > declarations: > ... AFAIK teh standrad the cursor is valid in the scope of its module, i.e. the source file it's listed in. > Is this by design? I seem to remember it working under 6.3.2, and this is > under 6.4.2 The new version does comply much more to the standard. Michael -- Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers! Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire! Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux! Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net | Use PostgreSQL!