Received: from mout0.01019freenet.de (exim@mout0.01019freenet.de [62.104.201.5]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA67091 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 14:36:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Michael.Meskes@gmx.net) Received: from [62.104.201.2] (helo=mx1.01019freenet.de) by mout0.01019freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #5) id 10uKXW-0001dv-00 for pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:35:58 +0200 Received: from [212.81.152.54] (helo=tanja.fam-meskes.de) by mx1.01019freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #5) id 10uKXB-0003Z3-01 for pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:35:38 +0200 Received: (from meskes@localhost) by tanja.fam-meskes.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id UAA01150 for pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:36:38 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:36:38 +0200 From: Michael Meskes To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation Message-ID: <19990616203638.A1114@gmx.net> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org References: <19990614091647.A562@gmx.net> <19990616153740.B1575@gmx.net> <3767B225.DA868563@alumni.caltech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <3767B225.DA868563@alumni.caltech.edu>; from Thomas Lockhart on Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 02:18:13PM +0000 On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 02:18:13PM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > I'd suggest *not* adding this non-SQL92 feature. afaik it adds no > functionality, so why bother messing with it? btw, OpenIngres1.1 did > not have this syntax either. I agree. My only reason for maybe adding it was that I wasn't sure about SQL92. But if it definitely is not in SQL92 I think we shouldn't bother. But then we have some other compatibility hacks too. Michael -- Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers! Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire! Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux! Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net | Use PostgreSQL!