Received: from tanja.fam-meskes.de (root@p3E9D3E27.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
	[62.157.62.39]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA78424;
	Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:14:11 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from michael@fam-meskes.de)
Received: (from michael@localhost)
	by tanja.fam-meskes.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id KAA01080;
	Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:37:24 +0200
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:37:24 +0200
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
To: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
Cc: "'Michael Meskes'" <meskes@postgresql.org>,
 pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ecpg and getting just assigned serial number
Message-ID: <19990915103724.B1050@gmx.net>
Mail-Followup-To: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>,
	'Michael Meskes' <meskes@postgresql.org>,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
References: <1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F748C084@S-NATH-EXCH2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F748C084@S-NATH-EXCH2>

On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 09:50:52AM +0200, Ansley, Michael wrote:
> I don't think that a sequence number should be going into sqlca.  This is
> what it sounds like you are going to do, yes?

But this wasn't what I meant. :-)

I wasn't wording very well. What I wanted to say was that I don't see much
of a chance to give back the serial as such. What I added to my TODO list
(and btw just committed the changed source) is the return of the OID for the
singleton insert.

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De           | Use PostgreSQL!