Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (root@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA78559; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 16:43:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id QAA11104; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 16:39:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199910102039.QAA11104@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) In-Reply-To: <3800D45F.B8C280F2@perio.unlp.edu.ar> from "Sergio A. Kessler" at "Oct 10, 1999 03:01:03 pm" To: "Sergio A. Kessler" Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 16:39:55 -0400 (EDT) CC: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-interfaces X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL56 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, we have discussed this, and will add it to the TODO list. > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Because the next release is going to probably be 7.0, if people have > > backward compatability library code that they have been dying to remove, > > this is the time for it. > > > > I don't recommend removing backward compatability with 6.4 or 6.5 > > releases, but if you have some code that is hanging around just to be > > compatible with 6.1 or earlier, I think it can be removed now. > > can the commands createuser and destroyuser be renamed to > pg_createuser and pg_destroyuser (as pg_dump) adding soft links to > preserve backwards compatibility (declaring previous commands > deprecated) ? > > the same can be done for createdb and destroydb ... > > I think is a much more nice namespace for Postgres wich is > important when you have thousands of commands in this times. > > -- > | Sergio A. Kessler http://sak.org.ar > -O_O- You can have it Soon, Cheap, and Working; choose *two*. > > ************ > -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026