Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (root@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA24729; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 12:02:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id LAA29508; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:43:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199910111543.LAA29508@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) In-Reply-To: <3801FF9A.D88C446E@alumni.caltech.edu> from Thomas Lockhart at "Oct 11, 1999 03:17:46 pm" To: Thomas Lockhart Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:43:33 -0400 (EDT) CC: "Sergio A. Kessler" , PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-interfaces X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL56 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Yes, we have discussed this, and will add it to the TODO list. > > > can the commands createuser and destroyuser be renamed to > > > pg_createuser and pg_destroyuser (as pg_dump) adding soft links to > > > preserve backwards compatibility (declaring previous commands > > > deprecated) ? > > > the same can be done for createdb and destroydb ... > > I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with > underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming > apocalypse ;) But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026