Received: from biology.nmsu.edu (biology.NMSU.Edu [128.123.5.72])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA34365;
	Mon, 11 Oct 1999 12:57:00 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from brook@biology.nmsu.edu)
Received: (from brook@localhost) by biology.nmsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id
 KAA17620;
	Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:56:30 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:56:30 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199910111656.KAA17620@biology.nmsu.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: biology.nmsu.edu: brook set sender to
	brook@biology.nmsu.edu using -f
From: Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>
To: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
CC: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar,
	pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
In-reply-to: <199910111543.LAA29508@candle.pha.pa.us> (message from Bruce
	Momjian on Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:43:33 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
References: <199910111543.LAA29508@candle.pha.pa.us>

   > I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
   > underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
   > apocalypse ;)

   But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?

Isn't the point to avoid naming conflicts.  Symlinks won't help that,
surely.

I agree; underscores are a pain.  If you must go this direction, I
suggest hyphens (-).

Cheers,
Brook