Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA36248 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:06:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from maillist@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id NAA05903; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:05:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <199910111705.NAA05903@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) In-Reply-To: <199910111658.KAA17623@biology.nmsu.edu> from Brook Milligan at "Oct 11, 1999 10:58:14 am" To: Brook Milligan Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:05:24 -0400 (EDT) CC: vev@michvhf.com, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL56 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Then perhaps we can also overhaul the installation. I installed about > > 5 times this past week and have it down to 4 or 5 steps (not including > > regression testing). > > Would this also be a relevant time to get a regression test to run on > a non-installed system? Couldn't this be done by starting up the > database on a different port from within the newly compiled source > tree for the purpose of testing? Gee, I never even though of that. What advantage would there be for that? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026