Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (maillist@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA61715;
	Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from maillist@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: (from maillist@localhost)
	by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id JAA02367;
	Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <199910121358.JAA02367@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910120117260.404-100000@thelab.hub.org> from The
	Hermit Hacker at "Oct 12, 1999 01:18:04 am"
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>,
	"Sergio A. Kessler" <ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>,
	PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL56 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > > I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
> > > underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
> > > apocalypse ;)
> > 
> > But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?
> 
> Oh, and, IMHO...remove, don't create symlinks...its a major release, we
> don't have to maintain backwards compatability...we aren't mIcrosoft, eh?
> :)

That is a good point.  We could remove them.  They don't get called very
often.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026