Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.de [194.25.134.17]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA94669 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:48:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from R.Hoellwarth@t-online.de) Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 129oAi-0005kd-06; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:48:40 +0100 Received: from beehive.hoellwarth (320088575261-0001@[193.159.125.117]) by fwd04.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 129oAZ-1tV6hcC; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:48:31 +0100 Received: (from ronald@localhost) by beehive.hoellwarth (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA23775 for pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:26:14 +0100 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:26:14 +0100 From: R.Hoellwarth@t-online.de (Ronald Hoellwarth) To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Forms too complex or to large in pgaccess? Message-ID: <20000116122614.A25949@beehive.hoellwarth> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org References: <387F9541.512D18A7@earthlink.net> <20000115224529.A20896@beehive.hoellwarth> <388178DD.7AC4DA8E@flex.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <388178DD.7AC4DA8E@flex.ro> X-Mailer: Mutt - http://www.mutt.org/ X-GnuPG: Get the better PGP at http://www.gnupg.org/ X-GnuPG-KeyID: 0x2F7A041A X-Sender: 320088575261-0001@t-dialin.net --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 09:53:01AM +0200 schrieb Constantin Teodorescu: > But, instead of finding them as you show us (with datacontrols) , why > don't you use this simple variant: >=20 > Scripts::execute "kz_bind" >=20 > Starting with version 0.98, PgAccess defines those namespaces (Forms, > Scripts, ...) that implement the simple commands "Open", "Execute", > "Design". >=20 > Please check if it works for you and drop me a note! Well. I commented the above code and added yours. As far as I see there is no difference.=20 When I remember it right, I thought about this very short and simple solution but didn't really know if there will be problems regarding the namespaces - because: I HAD such problems but managed to solve them. The somewhat more complex code I used assured me that the code in the script will be executed as if it was a part of the code wherein it is sourced. It was "my very own solution" which I was able to follow and understand. By that way I learned more about namespaces and datacontrols. As your version is definitly the shorter one I think it's the right way to sail around the problem. > Teo thanks for the hint and for the tool! ronald --=20 Ronald H=F6llwarth Registrierter Linux User #132865 GPG - SchluesselID 0x2F7A041A --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0d (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE4garVUlVI6i96BBoRAaCFAJ9rVNJtkkbA3GTc2V+RRg719qw+rACfQQUA AxG4/hLMH99Et4iLCea80MU= =qXuO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--