Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (pgman@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA10558; Tue, 2 May 2000 08:27:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id IAA09896; Tue, 2 May 2000 08:27:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200005021227.IAA09896@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status In-Reply-To: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C54E@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk> from Peter Mount at "May 2, 2000 01:04:43 pm" To: Peter Mount Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 08:27:43 -0400 (EDT) CC: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-interfaces X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL72 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200005/29 > > The java IRC channel says kaffe isn't very good, so maybe I shouldn't > be > > worried about it. They also said mutually-referencing java files are > > not a good either. > > > > PM: This is strange, because mutually referenced java files are quite > > common. In fact, some of the javax.swing classes do this, and I've > been > > doing it since 1.0.2 :-) Anyhow, kaffe was taken over by M$ a few > months > > ago... > > Oh, OK, so I will not worry about the self-referencing issue. BSD/OS > has a java beta out, but I am too busy on the book to upgrade. I will > not worry about it. Seems kaffe can run the jdbc classes just fine. > > PM: I wonder if someone has told the kaffe team about it? If it runs the > classes, then it must be their javac that has the bug. Their site is pretty sparse. I will send it in. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026