Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (pgman@s5-03.ppp.op.net [209.152.195.67]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA24733 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:24:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id RAA25470; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:24:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200005022124.RAA25470@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status In-Reply-To: from Joachim Achtzehnter at "May 2, 2000 11:53:17 am" To: Joachim Achtzehnter Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 17:24:22 -0400 (EDT) CC: PostgreSQL-interfaces , Thomas Lockhart X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL72 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200005/42 > Today, Bruce Momjian wrote in an email addressed to Joachim Achtzehnter: > > > > Interesting. It does compile under kaffe 1.05, but the mutually > > dependent java files cause a compile error. Seems 6.5.3 had the same > > problem, so I am not sure why it would have worked then. > > Well, it is conceivable that I was actually compiling it with jikes, and > only used Kaffe to run it. In fact, now that I think of it, this is most > likely what I did. Even then, with some version of the driver I had to > patch a runtime version check to make it behave as if Kaffe was a 1.1 JVM. > > It is true that Kaffe has a number of problems. Nevertheless, given that > it is licensed under the GPL some people prefer it over the alternatives > even if it has some drawbacks. Starting the kaffe 1.05, they now use KOPI as their java compiler. I have contacted them about the problem to see if they can help. This is clearly a kaffe-related problem, and not a problem with our jdbc, which is good news. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026