Received: from mamma.varadinet.de (varadinet.de [193.141.160.202]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e7359LG81388 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 01:09:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mamma.varadinet.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id 10BDFD388E; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 07:08:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 07:08:18 +0200 From: tomas@mamma.varadinet.de To: Oliver Elphick Cc: David Lloyd-Jones , David Lloyd-Jones , Lamar Owen , Thomas Lockhart , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [OT] init.d [was: Re: And Furthermore. Was: PSQL Working, but PGAccess Not Connecting.] Message-ID: <20000803070818.A1453@mail.aura.de> References: <200008020909.e7299A109163@linda.lfix.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200008020909.e7299A109163@linda.lfix.co.uk>; from olly@lfix.co.uk on Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:10AM +0100 X-Archive-Number: 200008/28 On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 10:09:10AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > "David Lloyd-Jones" wrote: > >But while I'm at it, I wonder if anybody knows why directories are named > >"rc.d" and "init.d"? > > [...] > .d = "directory" > In The Beginning (TM) it was just a huge shell script, /etc/rc. But when it became fashionable to `install packages' it was a growing pain to patch the corresponding start sequences into /etc/rc with sed and friends. Thus /etc/rc.d was born, as a sister to /etc/rc. > rc = "runlevel commands" ??? > Don't know either. But I think the concept of runlevel came later. Regards -- tomas