Received: from fargonauten.de (fargonauten.de [212.15.192.193])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB3LWgF32519
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 16:32:42 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from ingo@t17.fargonauten.de)
Received: from bombay.t17.fargonauten.de (t17.fargonauten.de [212.15.197.65])
	by fargonauten.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A59F3AC7; Sun,  3 Dec 2000 22:32:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bombay.t17.fargonauten.de (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 0B640C008; Sun,  3 Dec 2000 22:33:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:33:04 +0100
From: Ingo Luetkebohle <ingo@blank.pages.de>
To: Greg Speegle <Greg@10happythings.com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: jdbc: getBinaryStream blocks on second call
Message-ID: <20001203223304.A20177@blank.pages.de>
References: <20001203171302.B1619@blank.pages.de>
	<3A2A9A9D.9000803@10happythings.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A2A9A9D.9000803@10happythings.com>;
	from Greg@10happythings.com on Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 01:10:21PM
	-0600
Organization: Maybe when I grow up
X-URL: http://blank.pages.de/
X-Archive-Number: 200012/18
X-Sequence-Number: 355

On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 01:10:21PM -0600, Greg Speegle wrote:
> If you have to read it twice, the only way to gaurantee that it
> works, is to close the Statement and do it again.

Thanks for the tip, it led me in the right direction. Closing the
Statement didn't suffice, but closing the whole DB connection
worked. Not beautiful, but ok for the moment.

-- 
	Ingo Luetkebohle / ingo@blank.pages.de / 95428014
/
|PraxisXML Open Source contact; Computational Linguistics
|student; Fargonauten.DE sysadmin; Gimp Registry (not-)maintainer;