Received: from newsnipple.com ([208.243.144.102]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBS1rCL59011; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 20:53:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from adam@newsnipple.com) Received: by newsnipple.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B89D83116E; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:58:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:58:35 -0800 From: Adam Haberlach To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-interfaces Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL Message-ID: <20001227175835.C32586@newsnipple.com> References: <200012270556.AAA19258@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200012270556.AAA19258@candle.pha.pa.us>; from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us on Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:56:26AM -0500 X-Archive-Number: 200012/233 X-Sequence-Number: 579 On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:56:26AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have been asked by the major PHP developer Rasmus Lerdorf to see if > the PostgreSQL/PHP interface needs any improvements. > > Is the current PostgreSQL interface module in PHP adequate? Does it > support all the current libpq features? > > If not, would someone submit some patches to the PHP folks. They want > us to work well with PHP. They are basically encouraging us to improve > it in any way we can. I use PHP and Postgres together quite a bit, and find the APIs complete enough for most things. However, just last week I implemented pg_lolseek($loid, $offset $whence) and pg_lotell($loid) For some stuff that we are working on. They are pretty straightforward, and I can package them up and submit them if someone wants. -- Adam Haberlach |A cat spends her life conflicted between a adam@newsnipple.com |deep, passionate, and profound desire for http://www.newsnipple.com |fish and an equally deep, passionate, and '88 EX500 |profound desire to avoid getting wet.