From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <200101140308.WAA01140@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
In-Reply-To: <3A60E970.46B72421@xythos.com> "from Barry Lind at Jan 13, 2001
	03:49:04 pm"
To: Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:08:08 -0500 (EST)
CC: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

> Attached is a revised patch that removes the static SimpleDateFormat
> objects that Thomas pointed out might be a problem.

Thanks.  I will apply it as soon as I can.

> PS.  Is this the correct way to submit patches by sending to
> pgsql-patches?  It appeared from some of the comments on my last
> submission that there is some other approval/review process that I
> should go through first, but I don't see that documented anywhere, so if
> I am doing something wrong, please forgive me, and point me in the right
> direction.

No, Barry, you are doing great.  Seems we have an internal issue here
because I don't understand the java code, so I have trouble evaluating
it, and sometimes I am over-eager to get these jdbc fixes into the code.

Please, just keep doing what you are doing.  The JDBC driver needs all
the help it can get.

> PPS.  I have included and updated the comments from the original patch
> request to reflect the changes made in this revised patch.

Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026