Received: from newsnipple.com (www.newsnipple.com [208.243.144.102]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0NIBI087060; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:11:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from adam@newsnipple.com) Received: by newsnipple.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B79F3116E; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:09:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:09:08 -0800 From: Adam Haberlach To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Adam Haberlach , PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-interfaces Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL Message-ID: <20010123100908.B1565@newsnipple.com> References: <20001227175835.C32586@newsnipple.com> <200101230455.XAA07473@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200101230455.XAA07473@candle.pha.pa.us>; from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:55:56PM -0500 X-Archive-Number: 200101/950 X-Sequence-Number: 3645 On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:55:56PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 12:56:26AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I have been asked by the major PHP developer Rasmus Lerdorf to see if > > > the PostgreSQL/PHP interface needs any improvements. > > > > > > Is the current PostgreSQL interface module in PHP adequate? Does it > > > support all the current libpq features? > > > > > > If not, would someone submit some patches to the PHP folks. They want > > > us to work well with PHP. They are basically encouraging us to improve > > > it in any way we can. > > > > I use PHP and Postgres together quite a bit, and find the APIs > > complete enough for most things. However, just last week I implemented > > > > pg_lolseek($loid, $offset $whence) > > and > > pg_lotell($loid) > > > > For some stuff that we are working on. They are pretty straightforward, > > and I can package them up and submit them if someone wants. > > > Would to send this over to the PHP folks for inclusion? Thanks. I sent them patches against the at-the-time up-to-date CVS tree back when this first came up, they said that they failed, so I sent them another set, and have not heard back from them. It doesn't seem to show up in the cvs logs. I'll bug someone again and see if I can find out what happened. I mean, they only have 240 people with write access to the cvs tree... -- Adam Haberlach |A cat spends her life conflicted between a adam@newsnipple.com |deep, passionate, and profound desire for http://www.newsnipple.com |fish and an equally deep, passionate, and '88 EX500 |profound desire to avoid getting wet.