Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46] (may be forged)) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1N45ux66753; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:05:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) id XAA09302; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:04:23 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200102230404.XAA09302@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Chinese patch for Pgaccess In-Reply-To: <3A95D584.F12A42F0@zhengmai.com.cn> "from He Weiping(Laser Henry) at Feb 23, 2001 11:14:12 am" To: "He Weiping(Laser Henry)" Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:04:23 -0500 (EST) CC: Tatsuo Ishii , pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL77 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200102/1178 X-Sequence-Number: 5108 > > > > > appropriate. There are several encodings for Chinese including > > > GB(EUC-CN), Big5, EUC-TW. At least we should be able to distinguish > > > them. What about "chinese(GB)" or whatever? > > > > Renamed to chinese-gb. > > > > I think chinese-gb is ok, thanks! I ended up using chinese_gb. The underscore was more consistent. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026