Received: from smtp.cistron-office.nl (10fwd.cistron-office.nl
 [195.64.65.197])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f27MKfx09232
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:20:41 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from jtv@cistron-office.nl)
Received: from slipstream.cistron-office.nl ([195.64.65.252])
	by smtp.cistron-office.nl with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14amIJ-0000po-00; Wed, 07 Mar 2001 23:20:31 +0100
Received: by slipstream.cistron-office.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
	Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:20:31 +0100
From: "J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:20:31 +0100
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libpq++
Message-ID: <20010307232031.H3900@cistron.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	"J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
References: <20010307205247.E3900@cistron.nl>
	<200103072202.RAA02078@candle.pha.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To: <200103072202.RAA02078@candle.pha.pa.us>;
	from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:02:19PM
	-0500
X-Disclaimer: Include standard disclaimer here.
X-Archive-Number: 200103/72
X-Sequence-Number: 1233

On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Would that be OK?
> 
> Also, would you review this?
> 
> 	ftp://candle.pha.pa.us/pub/postgresql/libpq++.mbox
> 
> and merge any valuable changes into your copy of the code.  Much of it
> is already in there.

Will do.  Can I take it there have been no other changes between 7.0.3 and 7.2
as far as libpq++ is concerned, so I can continue to work with the version I
have?


Jeroen