Received: from smtp.cistron-office.nl (10fwd.cistron-office.nl [195.64.65.197]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f27NDfx00236 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:13:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jtv@cistron-office.nl) Received: from slipstream.cistron-office.nl ([195.64.65.252]) by smtp.cistron-office.nl with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14an7b-0001Lj-00; Thu, 08 Mar 2001 00:13:31 +0100 Received: by slipstream.cistron-office.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 8 Mar 2001 00:13:31 +0100 From: "J. T. Vermeulen" Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 00:13:31 +0100 To: Tom Lane Cc: "J. T. Vermeulen" , Bruce Momjian , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: libpq++ Message-ID: <20010308001331.J3900@cistron.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Lane , "J. T. Vermeulen" , Bruce Momjian , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org References: <20010307205247.E3900@cistron.nl> <200103072202.RAA02078@candle.pha.pa.us> <20010307232031.H3900@cistron.nl> <14371.984005072@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <14371.984005072@sss.pgh.pa.us>; from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:44:32PM -0500 X-Disclaimer: Include standard disclaimer here. X-Archive-Number: 200103/76 X-Sequence-Number: 1237 On Wed, 07 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > No, you shouldn't take it. For one thing, Peter E. has been > reorganizing the configure/build process, and that has impacted pretty > nearly everything. The changes aren't likely to be extensive, but you'd > still be facing a merge task when you are ready to submit diffs. Seems > like you might as well try to avoid that by starting from something more > current than 7.0.3. > > 7.1beta5 would probably be a reasonable starting point. Whew--thanks! Indeed, I'm just reading through the CVS overview and I see it now. Downloadink 7.1b5 & lookink forward to more merging... Jeroen