Received: from smtp.cistron-office.nl (10fwd.cistron-office.nl [195.64.65.197]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2CHV3x38054 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:31:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jtv@cistron-office.nl) Received: from slipstream.cistron-office.nl ([195.64.65.252]) by smtp.cistron-office.nl with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14cW9e-0004zB-00; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:30:46 +0100 Received: by slipstream.cistron-office.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:30:46 +0100 From: "J. T. Vermeulen" Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:30:46 +0100 To: Tom Lane Cc: "J. T. Vermeulen" , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: libpq++: combined patches based on 7.1b5 Message-ID: <20010312183045.T686@cistron.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Lane , "J. T. Vermeulen" , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org References: <20010312173756.S686@cistron.nl> <28065.984417520@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <28065.984417520@sss.pgh.pa.us>; from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:18:40PM -0500 X-Disclaimer: Include standard disclaimer here. X-Archive-Number: 200103/95 X-Sequence-Number: 1256 On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Yes. It's too late in the 7.1 cycle for anything except bug fixes, > though (and even there, probably only critical fixes...) I'm aware of that side--right now my worry is more whether 7.2 might be too early. Jeroen