Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f493OwA67392
	for <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org>; Tue, 8 May 2001 23:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
	by candle.pha.pa.us (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f493Oio22886;
	Tue, 8 May 2001 23:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <200105090324.f493Oio22886@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgres odbc driver bug
In-Reply-To: <3AF8B775.C63AE519@tpf.co.jp> "from Hiroshi Inoue at May 9, 2001
	12:20:21 pm"
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 23:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Keith Millard <Kmillard@pumatech.com>,
	PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL90 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Archive-Number: 200105/54
X-Sequence-Number: 443

> > Agreed.  I mentioned to Keith I was going to clean it up before
> > application.  Here is the cleaned up patch.
> > 
> > Hiroshi, what do you think?
> > 
> 
> Hmm that's not what I mean. The patch essentially means
> that the STMT_PREMATURE state is unnecessary. Well why is
> the concept *PREMATURE* introduced ? What meaning does the
> stuff related to the concept *PREMATURE* have ? IMHO we
> have to reconsider from the first.

Oh, so you need Keith to explain the patch.  OK.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026