Received: from smtp.cistron-office.nl (10fwd.cistron-office.nl [195.64.65.197]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4EDUEA80026 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 09:30:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jtv@cistron-office.nl) Received: from slipstream.cistron-office.nl ([195.64.65.252]) by smtp.cistron-office.nl with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14zIQJ-0006nt-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:30:07 +0200 Received: by slipstream.cistron-office.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 May 2001 15:30:07 +0200 From: "J. T. Vermeulen" Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:30:07 +0200 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: "J. T. Vermeulen" , PostgreSQL-interfaces Subject: Re: libpq++: combined patches based on 7.1b5 Message-ID: <20010514153006.G14645@cistron.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Bruce Momjian , "J. T. Vermeulen" , PostgreSQL-interfaces References: <20010312173756.S686@cistron.nl> <200105091733.f49HXwj13863@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <200105091733.f49HXwj13863@candle.pha.pa.us>; from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:33:58PM -0400 X-Disclaimer: Include standard disclaimer here. X-Archive-Number: 200105/66 X-Sequence-Number: 1593 On Wed, 09 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > As this includes all your previous patches, my guess is that we are all > caught up with you now in the CVS tree for 7.2. Yup. BTW maybe it would be better to just deprecate the existing API, doing just bugfixes on it (like the wider getLength() and such) and start afresh on a new, completely incompatible one along the lines I've described. On a different note, please note that since I'm changing jobs in a few weeks' time I'll have to revert to my private email address, jtv@xs4all.nl. Jeroen