Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6FDBA475DF1; Thu,  4 Jul 2002 07:24:31 -0400 (EDT)
Mailbox-Line: From mark@somanetworks.com  Thu Jul  4 07:24:31 2002
Received: from frogger.yyz.somanetworks.com (gw-yyz.somanetworks.com
	[216.126.67.39]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BE303475AB2; Thu,  4 Jul 2002 07:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by frogger.yyz.somanetworks.com (Postfix, from userid 506)
	id 7FB9A23B50; Thu,  4 Jul 2002 07:23:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 07:23:18 -0400
From: Mark Frazer <mark@somanetworks.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?)
Message-ID: <20020704072318.A22194@somanetworks.com>
References: <20020703171232.Z1375@somanetworks.com>
	<GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEONCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEONCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>;
	from chriskl@familyhealth.com.au on Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at
	09:38:33AM +0800
X-Message-Flag: Outlook not so good.
Organization: Detectable, well, not really
X-Bender: Bender's a genius!
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO
	version=2.30
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200207/11
X-Sequence-Number: 2820

Any idea why the table can't be seen with \d in psql then?

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> [02/07/04 00:21]:
> 
> No - they go away at the end of a _connection_.  However, there is now a
> patch floating around on -hackers that would add an ' ON COMMIT DROP;'
> option to CREATE TEMP TABLE.

-- 
In the event of an emergency, my ass can be used as a flotation
device. - Bender