Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2390475F63 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:13:33 -0400 (EDT) Mailbox-Line: From pgman@candle.pha.pa.us Thu Jul 4 22:13:33 2002 Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFF6475FEC for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g6529RT19334; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:09:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200207050209.g6529RT19334@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?) In-Reply-To: To: Christopher Kings-Lynne Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:09:27 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Mark Frazer , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.30 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200207/52 X-Sequence-Number: 8431 Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > IIRC they are only visible in the connection that created them? Am I right? > Either way, I don't think \d will show them - there might be another > command... > TODO has: * Allow psql \d to show temporary table structure Looks like it works fine now with schemas: test=> create temp table xx(x int); CREATE TABLE test=> \d List of relations Name | Type | Owner ------+-------+---------- x | table | postgres xx | table | postgres (2 rows) I will mark the TODO as done. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026