Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56ED476097 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:40:27 -0400 (EDT) Mailbox-Line: From pgman@candle.pha.pa.us Thu Jul 4 22:40:27 2002 Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52D5476743 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:39:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g652dU822949; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:39:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200207050239.g652dU822949@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Possible Bug regarding temp tables (sql or psql?) In-Reply-To: <7538.1025836376@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 22:39:30 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne , Mark Frazer , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.30 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200207/54 X-Sequence-Number: 8433 Tom Lane wrote: > Even uglier cases occur if some other connection has also created > a temp table named foo. You should *not* see that in \d ... but > you will. > > > I will mark the TODO as done. > > It's not really done, but the remaining fixes will fall out of making > psql schema-aware. The original bug is gone. We just have new ones. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026