Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C60047595D for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:41:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from newsguy.com (smtp.newsguy.com [216.148.53.69]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A99947591C for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:41:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from pacquet@localhost) by newsguy.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id OAA71833 for pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org.; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200208132141.OAA71833@newsguy.com> X-Mailer: Direct Read Email by Newsguy News Service To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org From: pacquet@newsguy.com Subject: PQputline in BINARY mode? X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200208/36 X-Sequence-Number: 2998 OK, I've tested both a COPY BINARY FROM which was very fast, and now I've also done: PQputline(conn, ) the question is, can I combine both techniques, and use a programmatic interface to copy binary information? We have an data collection application which needs to insert a huge amount of (binary) information very quickly, so I'm interested in squeezing out every last CPU cycle. (any other tips you have will also be appreciated). Thanks