Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:59:24 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org,
	Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed 
In-Reply-To: <GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCENDCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Message-ID: <20020821225850.L36114-100000@mail1.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should have such on
the current one until the new portal is in place ...

Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the left side?

On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org
> home page?  Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there?
>
> Chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
> >
> >
> >
> > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
> > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
> > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
> > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
> > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
> >
> > let me know if there are any problems ...
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >
>
>