Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB4D4759A1; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:36:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from earth.hub.org (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B1047580E; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:36:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from earth.hub.org (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11]) by earth.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7562CCA81; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:36:14 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:36:14 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Christopher Kings-Lynne Cc: Vince Vielhaber , , Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020821233553.Q36114-100000@mail1.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200208/70 X-Sequence-Number: 3032 On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Where can we see the new portal? Maybe it should be designed in such a way > as to not use image links at all. From all my experience in doing > websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea. I don't believe we are using image links on the new portal ... > > Chris > > > > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should > > have such on > > > the current one until the new portal is in place ... > > > > > > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the > > left side? > > > > Sure. Make me a button that matches the rest. That's what the holdup > > has been for any changes. That's why I've been soliciting new designs. > > The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been > > trying to tell you that for months. > >