Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B83475921 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:57:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from relay04.roc.frontiernet.net (relay04.roc.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.37]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F8D475530 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 14:56:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14265 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2002 18:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO there) ([170.215.128.148]) (envelope-sender ) by relay04.roc.frontiernet.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Sep 2002 18:56:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: terry Organization: None To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:25:42 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020904185659.32F8D475530@postgresql.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/39 X-Sequence-Number: 3100 >> > >> Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind >> > >> of correct. >> > >> > Actually, the window is called "Relationships", not >> > "Relations".... >> >> Correct. Was lazy to look it up. Does this change something? Not really, I was just following up on the discussion about the incorrect use of the term Relations by MS Access. I don't think that Relationships is a bad tab label - except that it's a bit long for the current size tabs :). Access's Relationships are all placed on one canvas, regardless of whether or not there are several independent diagrams present. If this model is to be used by pgaccess, it would make just as much sense to put 'Relationships' into the Database menu instead of a tab, since the New, Open, and Design actions would not mean anything. the-$0.02-of-an-old-Access-developer-wishing-the-best-to-pgaccess ... terry