Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4266E4760DA; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:45:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [194.97.50.132]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B1F476842; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:45:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [194.97.50.138] (helo=mx0.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17oqwO-00042f-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:44:52 +0200 Received: from b1f56.pppool.de ([213.7.31.86] helo=fam-meskes.de) by mx0.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.10 #1) id 17oqwN-0006z2-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:44:52 +0200 Received: by fam-meskes.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6382BA6033; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:42:23 +0200 From: Michael Meskes To: PostgreSQL Interfaces , PostgreSQL Hacker Subject: ODBC problem/question Message-ID: <20020910194223.GA30816@feivel.fam-meskes.de> Mail-Followup-To: PostgreSQL Interfaces , PostgreSQL Hacker Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/651 X-Sequence-Number: 28610 Hi, I was just contacted by a customer about the SQLProcedureColumns call in our odbc driver. It appears this call is undefined in the standard odbc driver but is available in odbcplus. Could anyone please enlighten me why this was forked and not merged into one driver? Is there a problem when I take the odbcplus code and put it into the odbc driver? Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!