Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A520C475CA9 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 04:47:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.16]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3967F475AFA for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 04:47:06 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 54173 messnum 519585 invoked from network[159.134.167.242/p1010.as1.limerick1.eircom.net]); 21 Nov 2002 09:47:06 -0000 Received: from p1010.as1.limerick1.eircom.net (HELO dansat.data-plan.com) (159.134.167.242) by mail00.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 54173) with SMTP; 21 Nov 2002 09:47:06 -0000 Received: from dansat.data-plan.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dansat.data-plan.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAL9l9ao017041; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:47:09 GMT (envelope-from timbo@dansat.data-plan.com) Received: (from timbo@localhost) by dansat.data-plan.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAL9l9cP017040; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:47:09 GMT Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:47:09 +0000 From: Tim Bunce To: David Wheeler Cc: Tim Bunce , dbi-dev@perl.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: DBD::PgSQL: More Queestions Message-ID: <20021121094709.GI381@dansat.data-plan.com> References: <20021120104950.GU381@dansat.data-plan.com> <5C9E6A6E-FCF5-11D6-8943-0003931A964A@wheeler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5C9E6A6E-FCF5-11D6-8943-0003931A964A@wheeler.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/136 X-Sequence-Number: 3384 On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 06:03:00PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote: > First, I want to thank everyone who has responded to my posts. I know > that they're chock full 'o newbie questions, and I *really* appreciate > the patient explanations that all you folks are taking the time to send > to me. I *really* appreciate it. The only side affects are that I now > have to spend much more time writing and responding to emails, and that > I'm much more motivated to spend the time getting to know the code so > that I have the knowledge to create an effective update. I couldn't > have done it without you all. Thanks! No problem. You're questions are good and we're probably all learning something. > On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 02:49 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: > > >Drivers should rarely if ever print anything below trace level 3. > >Quite a few drivers get this wrong and it can be quite annoying to > >the users to have to wade through lots of driver output when all > >they want is the basic DBI level 1 or 2 trace. Use levels around > >4 through 7 to add more (obscure) detail. > > So, 4 for more informative stuff, and down through 7 to report, say, > every function executed? Yeap. (DBD::Oracle uses 9 for that now but I may change it.) Tim.