Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A1B475ADE for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:58:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049144753A1 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:58:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from stllnx1.stlassoc.com (pcp02115715pcs.selrsv01.pa.comcast.net [68.81.241.63]) by mtaout04.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 1.5 (built Sep 23 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H6G005HN9T2S1@mtaout04.icomcast.net> for pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:58:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from tlowery by stllnx1.stlassoc.com with local (MasqMail 0.1.8c) id 18IXQ6-0Gg-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:58:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:58:14 -0500 From: "Thomas A. Lowery" Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DBD::Pg 1.20 In-reply-to: To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, dbi-dev@perl.org Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, dbi-dev@perl.org Message-id: <20021201165814.GA18541@stllnx1.stlowery.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.18-18.7.x (i586) X-Uptime: 11:42am up 11 days, 13:42, 9 users, load average: 0.44, 0.40, 0.24 References: <84A43EBC-0235-11D7-929B-0003931A964A@wheeler.net> <87k7ivt0f6.fsf@openinformatics.com> <20021130204742.GA17239@stllnx1.stlowery.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200212/3 X-Sequence-Number: 3416 On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 07:38:52PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:47:09AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > > > "Dave Rolsky" writes: > > > > > > > I found a bug in the ->tables method. It includes all the system tables. > > > > A patch is at the bottom of the message. > > > > I modified the tables and table_info methods to include the system tables. > > Why? It's really pretty irritating since they _always_ will be included. > And you didn't modify the docs to match, since they still say that they're > _not_ included. My mistake on the docs, I'll correct them. I find it irritating that the systems tables are NOT included. Is there a good reason to exclude them? The advance meta data methods provide a means to write portable code across the different drivers, let's not leave DBD::Pg out. Tom -- Thomas A. Lowery See DBI/FAQ http://xmlproj.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/fom