Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D504769E8; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:51:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (momjian.navpoint.com [207.106.42.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A454767E0; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:50:52 -0500 (EST) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id gBB3ob120325; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:50:37 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200212110350.gBB3ob120325@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem In-Reply-To: <26089.1039535284@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:50:37 -0500 (EST) Cc: Ian Barwick , dbi-dev@perl.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200212/623 X-Sequence-Number: 33078 Tom Lane wrote: > Ian Barwick writes: > > Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there). > > Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change > desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads > in the pghackers archives over the last year or so that discuss the > different things we want to do, though. (Improving the error-reporting > framework and fixing the COPY protocol are a couple of biggies I can > recall offhand.) Listing protocol changes seemed too low-level for the TODO list, but I have kept the email messages. Today I updated the TODO list and added a section for them. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073