Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B24476106; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:17:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (momjian.navpoint.com [207.106.42.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4D04760AD; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:17:19 -0500 (EST) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id h08FGtL18275; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:16:55 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200301081516.h08FGtL18275@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: python interface In-Reply-To: <200301080857.42554.darcy@druid.net> To: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:16:55 -0500 (EST) Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-interfaces X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/402 X-Sequence-Number: 34012 D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Saturday 04 January 2003 19:58, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Let me know how it goes, and what the project is ... that way we can move > > the current CVS over so that we don't lose the extensive logging history > > Hmm. I didn't think that it was suggested to move the repository again. I > thought I was just going to add a pointer to the PyGreSQL page but leave the > code where it was. If we move it won't it make it harder to add it with just > a config option like we do now? Yes, it will make it harder, but we can release independently, and others may get more involved in it. We have moved the CVS for most of the interfaces, and they are doing fine on gborg. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073