Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3192475F34 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mxzilla3.xs4all.nl (mxzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.49]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115B5475EB2 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 12:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from xs1.xs4all.nl (xs1.xs4all.nl [194.109.3.11]) by mxzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h08HUTbn061180; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:30:30 +0100 (CET) Received: (from jtv@localhost) by xs1.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h08HUTk80001; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:30:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jtv) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:30:29 +0100 From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" To: Key88 SF Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: libpqxx Large Objects Message-ID: <20030108173029.GA62724@xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Key88 SF , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/43 X-Sequence-Number: 3543 On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:00:07AM +0000, Key88 SF wrote: > > I was looking for support for Large Objects with libpqxx, but couldn't find > anything special. Does that mean I need to use the libpq large-object > functions? Any plans for adding LO support in the future? AFAIK libpq's large object support is itself obsolete. Documentation suggests the functionality has been integrated in regular tables. Jeroen