Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A492E4758C9 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:34:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from mxzilla2.xs4all.nl (mxzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.50]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D52474E42 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:34:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from xs1.xs4all.nl (xs1.xs4all.nl [194.109.3.11]) by mxzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h092YhQV002899; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 03:34:43 +0100 (CET) Received: (from jtv@localhost) by xs1.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h092Yhl01524; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 03:34:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jtv) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 03:34:43 +0100 From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" To: Key88 SF Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: libpqxx Large Objects Message-ID: <20030109023443.GC80851@xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Key88 SF , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/51 X-Sequence-Number: 3551 On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:23:18AM +0000, Key88 SF wrote: > > Really? Where do you see that? I'm looking at the libpq - C library > documentation, section 2, describing large objects. I don't see any > mention of the interface being deprecated. It doesn't seem to be documented there, no. I've no time to dig it up now (I'll be on a holiday for the coming week) so you may just want to search the site. Or just see if postgres will handle the kind of object size you need as native table data. BTW, yes, libpq++ had notional large-object support--but that was never actually fully functional, from what I hear. Jeroen