X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FB147580B
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 01:55:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cpc-gw2.cpc.net.au (unknown [210.9.248.93])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DED474E44
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 01:55:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from utiba.com (IDENT:root@ser1.cpc.net.au [192.168.0.19])
	by (Utiba Mail Thingy 2/1.1.3) with ESMTP id h2S5nZZ20987;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:49:35 +1100
Received: from Utiba Mail Thingy
	by utiba.com (Dunno/1.1.2) with ESMTP id RAA24452;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:55:24 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>
Organization: Utiba
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: ECPG thread-safety
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:49:04 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <200303280200.h2S20N218363@candle.pha.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <200303280200.h2S20N218363@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200303281749.04746.philip@utiba.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.1 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200303/170
X-Sequence-Number: 3919

On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:00, you wrote:
> I have put a mailbox file at:
>
> 	ftp://candle.pha.pa.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches
>
> where there is a partial implementation of thread-safe ecpg.  Maybe you
> can work with Michael to complete it.

Okay, thanks for that. Have grabbed the file, and started reading. I'll als=
o=20
wait to hear from Michael or Lee before going too far on this.=20

Everything I have read so far suggests the issue is related to SQLCA itself=
...=20
and that would be consistent with what happens in the backend (data is=20
inserted, but threads lock straight after). Can anyone enlighten me further?

Thanks and regards, Philip.