X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0F94758F1; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:37:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (momjian.navpoint.com [207.106.42.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3350E474E44; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:37:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id h3FKaqx06256; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:36:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200304152036.h3FKaqx06256@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol In-Reply-To: <7056.1050012288@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:36:52 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Barry Lind , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-26.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/525 X-Sequence-Number: 38015 Tom Lane wrote: > Barry Lind writes: > > This all sounds great. I am really looking to seeing all of this > > implemented. Are you still on schedule for getting this into 7.4? > > I gotta get off my duff and get with it, but I still plan to do it. I am wondering if the wondering if the start of 7.5 may not be a better time for such a massive change, and to give interfaces time to catch up. Also, is Patrick going to need your help for PITR in 7.4? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073