X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18544758F1; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:45:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from henry.newn.cam.ac.uk (henry.newn.cam.ac.uk [131.111.204.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284B7475AE5; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:44:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [131.111.204.180] (helo=quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk) by henry.newn.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 195lLQ-0000cP-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:44:52 +0100 Received: from prlw1 by quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.10) id 195lLQ-0005Zk-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:44:52 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:44:52 +0100 From: Patrick Welche To: Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments Message-ID: <20030416124452.C16683@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk> References: <10770.1050448110@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10770.1050448110@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/573 X-Sequence-Number: 38063 On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:08:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I have committed a first-draft revision of the FE/BE protocol document; > you can read it at > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/protocol.html > or in a few hours at > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/protocol.html > I'd appreciate it if people would look it over for both presentation > and content. Just showing my ignorance: I read 46.2.3 Extended Query, and wondered "What is a portal?" (portal == cursor?) also noted that SQL EXECUTE (prepared statement) != Execute (portal) and in 46.3. Message Data Types, reading "There is no predefined limit on the length of a string that can be returned by the backend." one might say Oh no! but of course you know what it's maximum size is by then, as you know the length of the response which contains the string.. Cheers, Patrick