X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD1BD1B53B for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:43:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01778-05 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:43:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11295D1B4F6 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:42:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from xs1.xs4all.nl (xs1.xs4all.nl [194.109.21.2]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hABIgvQO064181; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:42:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from xs1.xs4all.nl (jtv@localhost.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by xs1.xs4all.nl (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hABIgvxE015246; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:42:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jtv@xs4all.nl) Received: (from jtv@localhost) by xs1.xs4all.nl (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hABIguB2015245; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:42:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jtv) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:42:56 +0100 From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen" To: Julie Russell Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: libpqxx Message-ID: <20031111184256.GA4814@xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Julie Russell , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/10 X-Sequence-Number: 4568 On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:25:05AM +1100, Julie Russell wrote: > > /usr/include/pqxx/connection.h:185: error: extraneous `int' ignored > /usr/include/pqxx/connection.h:185: error: parse error before `)' token Looks like you're using an outdated version... Have you looked at the 2.0 release? See http://pqxx.tk/ (slightly easier than looking it up at GBorg). Out of interest, which version were you using and where did you get it from? Because I don't recall ever seeing this problem before with 1.5.1, which has been the stable release for many months and is still fairly widely used AFAIK. Jeroen