X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877E0D1B476
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:20:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 74880-06
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 06:19:38 -0400 (AST)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9D8D1DA2C
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 06:19:35 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AEB9456018; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:19:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from colt.pezone.net (dsl-082-082-236-215.arcor-ip.net
	[82.82.236.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 76E2B55F2F; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:19:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Jonathan Gardner <jgardner@jonathangardner.net>,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PQsetNoticeReceiver issues
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:19:58 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
References: <200401180027.35723.jgardner@jonathangardner.net>
In-Reply-To: <200401180027.35723.jgardner@jonathangardner.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401181119.58577.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200401/10
X-Sequence-Number: 4679

Jonathan Gardner wrote:
> I've run into a conundrum with the PQsetNoticeReceiver function call.
> How do you set it back to the original default? How do you call the
> appropriate PQnoticeProcessor as well?

The documentation says:

 Each of these functions returns the previous notice receiver or 
processor function pointer, and sets the new value. If you supply a 
null function pointer, no action is taken, but the current pointer is 
returned.