X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084B5D1D26F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33117-10 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:26:53 -0400 (AST) Received: from web40605.mail.yahoo.com (web40605.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.142]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76D58D1D313 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:26:49 -0400 (AST) Message-ID: <20040210022652.80342.qmail@web40605.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [135.214.42.162] by web40605.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:26:52 PST Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:26:52 -0800 (PST) From: Brett Schwarz Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface libpgtcl? To: L J Bayuk , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Cc: karl@procplace.com, brett_schwarz@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <200402100148.i1A1msCE000407@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/10 X-Sequence-Number: 4703 I don't quite understand why it has to be one way or the other. Why don't you just ask for admin/update proviledges, and get added to the project? That's what I did when Karl started the project. I believe there have already been some of the bug fixes rolled in from the PG sources, from other people. One of the problems I see is that it was asked over a year ago to separate libpgtcl from the core, and Karl did that. But people continued to update the core libpgtcl for some reason, I am not sure why. Did you base your changes off of the Gborg project or the libpgtcl that's still in the core? I would welcome your changes into the gborg, but I don't think there is any reason to create a new project or change admins at this point. Just because I don't have time now to make any updates, doesn't mean I won't later... --- L J Bayuk wrote: > It has now been over a year since the last beta > release of the unbundled > libpgtcl on gborg.postgresql.org. This interface > seems to have gotten > itself stuck part-way towards unbundling. Are the > project admins still > around (Brett Schwarz and Karl Lehenbauer)? From > back in Nov 2002, I think > the 1.4b3 code was release quality, but there wasn't > much documentation. > Now the code also needs to be resynchronized with > fixes in the bundled > libpgtcl. > > If the current project admins don't want it, nobody > else steps forward, and > the PostgreSQL Group is still in favor of unbundling > this interface, I > would like to take over the project. I've done some > work on the code, and > my own version is much further along than 1.4b3 on > gborg. I have: > - Rolled in the PostgreSQL-7.4 (and later) > fixes; > - Added new features: prepared queries, extended > error codes, > transaction status, extended field attributes, > backend parameters, > notice/warning message handlers, NULL value > testing (these are > also in my pgin.tcl pure-Tcl interface); > - Various cleanups, fixes, finish conversion to > Tcl objects; > - A Makefile for the free Borland C compiler to > build a DLL for > Windows, which works with the latest > ActiveState Tcl binary release; > - A test suite using tcltest; > - Made lots of progress on the Docbook > documentation. > > What do you think? Should the (former) admins step > aside, and let me > take over? Or do we give up and re-bundle it? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html